Let's analyze the conditions:
1. T cannot sit next to P (
T=P).
2. S cannot sit next to M (
S=M).
3. R must sit next to M (
R=M). Note: The Bengali translation implies
R sits *after*
M.
(a) M, S... -> S is next to M. Violates condition 2.
(b) M, S... -> S is next to M. Violates condition 2.
(d) T, R, M, P, S, O -> If strict direction is implied (R after M), then R before M violates condition 3. Or, looking at adjacency, R and M are together, which is fine, but usually, in these questions, if one option fits all directional logic perfectly, it's preferred.
Here sequence is circular: T-O-P-S-M-R-(T).
- S and M are adjacent. However, if the condition 'S cannot sit next to M' implies 'S cannot follow M', then here M follows S, which is allowed. The Bengali text clarifies 'M এর পরে S বসতে পারে না' (S cannot sit after M). In (c), S is before M, so it is valid.
- R must sit next to (after) M. Here R follows M. Valid.
- T cannot sit next to (after) P. Here S follows P, not T. Valid.
Therefore, (c) is the only valid arrangement respecting the directional constraints.